| 
     
	
		| Pool Disinfection Systems Comparison |  
 |  | 
		
			| Pool Disinfection 
			Systems Comparison |  
			| This is a brief comparison of various water treatment 
			technologies used in pool and spa equipment. All technologies listed should be considered "supplemental" 
			disinfection technologies whereas primary disinfection systems must 
			be employed to insure minimal possibility of cross-infection.
 
 
				
					| Technology | Avg. Initial Cost | OperationalCosts
 | OngoingMaintenance Costs
 | MaintenanceSkill Level
 | Drawbacks |  
					| Ozone | $1k & up | $hundreds per year
 | $hundreds per year
 | High | 1. Special filters required 2. High power 
					draw
 3. Close monitoring needed
 4. Expensive to operate
 5.  Expensive to maintain
 6. Ozone is toxic!
 |  
					| UV | $1K & up | $hundreds per year
 | $hundreds per year
 | High | 1. Lamp output degrades with time 2. 
					Scaling reduces effectiveness
 3. High power draw
 4. Expensive to operate and maintain
 |  
					| AquaKLEAR | $1k & up | Less than $20 per year
 | None | None | New technology not yet widely recognized. |  |  |  | 
 |